Just another rainy day in a
quiet neighborhood ....
One never knows .... does
one ??
A segment from:
"The Clock That Went Backward"
By Edward Page Mitchell
published in September 1881
"Your clock does not go," suddenly remarked the
professor. "Does it ever go?"
"Never since we can remember," I replied.
"That is, only once, and then it went backward ...."
Here I caught a warning glance from Harry. I
laughed and stammered, "The clock is old and useless. It cannot be made to
go."
"Only backward?" said the professor, calmly, and not
appearing to notice my embarrassment. "Well, and why should not a clock go
backward? Why should not Time itself turn and retrace its course?"
He seemed
to be waiting for an answer. I had none to give.
I thought
you Hegelian enough," he continued, "to admit that every condition
includes its own contradiction. Time is a condition, not an essential. Viewed
from the Absolute, the sequence by which future follows present and present
follows past is purely arbitrary. Yesterday, today, tomorrow; there is no
reason in the nature of things why the order should not be tomorrow, today,
yesterday."
A sharper
peal of thunder interrupted the professor's speculations.
"The
day is made by the planet's revolution on its axis from west to east. I fancy you
can conceive conditions under which it might turn from east to west, unwinding,
as it were, the revolutions of past ages. Is it so much more difficult to
imagine Time unwinding itself; Time on the ebb, instead of on the flow; the
past unfolding as the future recedes; the centuries countermarching; the course
of events proceeding toward the Beginning and not, as now, toward the
End?"
"But,"
I interposed, "we know that as far as we are concerned the ...."
"We
know!" exclaimed Van Stopp, with growing scorn. "Your intelligence
has no wings. You follow in the trail of Compte and his slimy brood of creepers
and crawlers. You speak with amazing assurance of your position in the
universe. You seem to think that your wretched little individuality has a firm
foothold in the Absolute. Yet you go to bed tonight and dream into
existence men, women, children, beasts of the past or of the future. How do you
know that at this moment you yourself, with all your conceit of
nineteenth-century thought, are anything more than a creature of a dream of the
future, dreamed, let us say, by some philosopher of the sixteenth century? How
do you know that you are anything more than a creature of a dream of the past,
dreamed by some Hegelian of the twenty-sixth century? How do you know, boy,
that you will not vanish into the sixteenth century or 2060 the moment the
dreamer awakes?"